Okay, I read the twenty point peace plan produced by the trump screen…

Okay, I read the twenty point peace plan produced by the trump screen writers. Despite its origins, I recognized some truths in it that set examples of why it should happen but will ultimately be a disaster and why if it doesn't, it will also be a disaster.

First of all, there are truths exposed. It seems that prior to Oct 7th, 2023, Hamas was taking the stance of defending their Palestinian heritage from further military encroachment by Israel, which had been taking place since the Mandate. On Oct 7th, the waters were clearly muddied by the absence of what really happened, by both the invaders and the always prepared Israeli propaganda response. Meanwhile, Hamas retreated back to its tunnels and a defensive posture, making the attack seem as if it was merely an exercise in military strategy with no real significant purpose in furthering Palestinian prospects for statehood, if there is even such a thing. It only enraged the Zionists full time desire to complete their greater Israel plan, which they are nearly completing that project now.

Hamas is defeated as an organization, both militarily and diplomatically, while Israel has overreached the point of no return in its genocidal/ ethnic cleansing of Gaza.

If there is one thing the American left and progressive thinkers have too much of in this era we've entered into, is a belief in persevering hope for the hopeless, or helpless. 

Before I go too much further, I want to say that America is not great, and in my historical analysis, has never been great, so don't think I'm thinking we will be great again. But I also think, democracy and its ideals, have never been great either. To this day, communists on the left, have believed in a fantasy of socialistic governance, simply because the writers of the communist script, and the actors who initiated it, are believed to be the progenitors of the great social/communistic future. The rest of the left is scattered amongst all the imaginable supporters of makeover politics, make America more socialistic than it is, recognizing there are certain elements of socialism currently embedded, the obvious one being social security. Also, on the liberal side of the left are those, who most of the time control the mediocre view that if there's going to be any change, it'll be slow and ultimately, reversible, if the people are willing.

All this has brought us to this moment, America on the verge, or the edge, of making the world Right again.

Here's some facts.

Whatever it was about the civil war yesterday, there is still some nostalgia about that time today, all though no one really understands, or can understand, what it is about it that needs to be relived.

That also applies to the revolutionary cause around which colonial threw off the imperial.

What about communism? It got off to a big start with promises of worker-controlled living over wealth-controlled work and living. But like America, which is hardly what the idealists of the past wanted it to be, neither Russia nor china and other socialist style nations represent the equality of a worker run state. The same applies to many of the countries, such as Cuba, that had relatively successful revolutions but have since become so internally strict to hold whatever remnants of the revolution together. Is it the failure of the ideals, whether it be America, England, Russia or Cuba, as examples, that the ideals fail, or maybe, even rise, then fall? I'll get to that in a minute.

Fascists, by their very nature, want to rule by military force or the threat of force. It's in their nature. And they are right to believe that force is a better way to rule because fear is the ideal upon which they live.

Idealists who believe that organization, reason, and the natural tendencies of cooperation, collaboration, and connectiveness, are by their very nature, pacifists.

The world is overpopulated. Most people live in nations that have little to do with their survival. Idealism, democracy, capitalism, socialism have little to do with the survival economies of the third world. Yet, every political system says they have those people in mind when they promote their own worthless ideals.

While fascists promote and use fear, another aspect of fascism is an international regulated, controlled monetary system which is used to make sure some nations get credit and most nations get undeveloped by sanction or obsolescence.

Even Russian, Chinese, western oligarchs use the international money system by the ownership in stock or capital investments. All these systems contribute to the strangulation of any progressive or even democratic ideals. We're beyond the pale.

We're living in a rigid, worldwide system of monetary values determined by the international I.e. worldwide competition by oligarchs and political leaders who have the militaries to back up these oligarchs, who themselves are contained by national ideological premises that don't really exist. A Russian oligarch is different than an American one in one way only, the political system of their home nation. In reality, wealth frees them somewhat from the structure in as much as the range of their wealth.

One message to anyone who believes they have something to offer is "practice what you preach," which, actually when I think about it, is a good way to understand what fascists and other so-called influencers are doing, by watching what these preachers are practicing?

There are no communes nor cooperatives functioning without a majority utilizing compromising capitalist involvement. In some ways, tech companies have experimented with "communal type working/living environments" which is a necessary component in transitioning the standard suffocating capitalist ideal of each according to their wants and desires. A little (or big) space, isolated from the people across the wall or yard or community seems to be what the middle class considers a perfect example of individual desire over social cohesiveness, which, also, has been delineated as the ideal of socialism, We all may want socialism but want to share it with privatized, profit oriented capital in control. 

Green energy is probably just as detrimental to the earthen environment as oil and gas. I say this because the real problem is not what resources produce the most carbon dioxide or plastic and lithium poisoning but relying on consumer based, profit oriented appetites of the voracious public can never solve our continuous roller coaster problems.

We have a system, or systems, of transportation that are reliant on a heavy use of detrimental resources as well, as vulnerable to disintegration, decay, and constant maintenance. After all, we do live on a planet where things rust, flood, burn, and where any change has a good chance of hurting something else.

And lastly, us human beings are so fallible, potentially susceptible to greed, murder, and unreasonable inbred hatred's that almost make fascism seem like a natural born killer of democratic principles, which it is.

Sent from my iPad