With the iran vs us-israel world war crawling along on shoestring budgets, rope a dope strategy and miscalculation on everyone's part and ukraine and russia in full blown exchanges of modern gunfire, the earth burning in heatwaves and real flames, we stupidly go on, don't we? There's a lot of myths being blown up around the world along with tit for tat warfare, isn't there? Does anyone still believe ground troop invasion anywhere in the world is a real strategy, especially when nations are just too big to fail by colonization. No emperor to be wants to bloody their hands that much, putin, the us, and israel, exceptions noted. I guess as long as you keep your own nations death count secret, just keep it locked up in your closeted consciousness. Drones are the weapon of choice these days, technology coming to the rescue again. Threats are big but after a while people lose interest: us, iran, take note. Colonial rule from afar, such as by sanction, hostility, military intervention, all have a certain amount of prowess, but starving people to death, killing innocents (by that, we can define "innocents" as those who are not fighting back). The claim of self-defense has been completely misappropriated by the victors rather than the victims, such as in a nuclear state obviously willing to commit genocide, ethnic cleansing, murder, sanction by any means necessary. No folks, Israel and the US are not valiant versions of the Black Panthers, the Thirteen colonies, or any other citizens/movement's attempt to be free from any dictator or imperial president, such as in everywhere. I think thats taken for granted among all peoples, whether citizens or those just held in contempt by the nation state.
It's a law of equilibrium, not an international humanitarian law established by the very oppressor states which either rule or want to rule by decree and not by necessity.
There has always been a weird transactional philosophy that emerged from the last two centuries in america. From colonies to democratic dictatorship is not unfamiliar transition. It happens all the time, from liberation to self-defense. The state has no exclusive right to domestic self-defense and in today's example, just because Israel never wanted to accept any responsibility for its Palestinian "caretaker" status, as outlined in the very charter which allowed them to form the state of Israel, does not mean they have any right to claim self-defense against a segment of their population that rebels because the state oppresses them.
No matter whether you believe in climate change or not or think capital (money) interests should be managing the world resources or not, it's ridiculous for anyone to deny there is a problem. Or many problems. Civilization is at a reckoning point. I doubt technology is going to save us from itself. I doubt we're going to save us from each other's flags, allegiances, guns, and the thrill of chaos we create for ourselves. No superheroes, billionaires, nation, philosophy, nor gods will be stepping in to save our necks.
Where does that leave us? Bluntly, up shit creek without a paddle, as they say somewhere in the alligator swamps of america. It's not within the purview of this blog or the sometimes belief of this writer that i know best but from my best guess, there is not one best all-encompassing solution but many small, healthy possibilities, we all need to start shopping around and take a side and then live it, protect it (yes, exercise your own right to self defense) and protect your allies while you're at it.