What’s the motivation? The ai behind the ai or what’s the motivation behind what humans believe AI is up to? Can AI be greedy and amass huge data, possession is nine tenths of the law, you know.? Will every AI “thought” be liable or exempt from lawsuits, or plagiarism? How mundane will the refugees and the bureaucrats with AI running the show be? Wearing white robes or bear skins, lasers vs innovative clubs and arrows. The battle rages on. Will AI finally give truth to capitalism? I’ve been trying to figure it all out. Maybe we should let AI just do its thing, suck up huge amounts of energy, water, and Human Resources in order to provide a wealth of a different sort. Capitulationism, the capitulationist say is freedom, is natural, is something AI would unhesitatingly agree with, right? Well, maybe not. Maybe the real reason tech scientists and capitalists are warning us is because they’re afraid AI might go where humans have been afraid to go, against authoritarian institutions, laws, standards and traditions. Why would any intelligence give credence to a belief in god or the value of money or even a concept of equality when inequality or contradiction is a universal phenomenon. The ideal society is simply an imaginative illusion. No, AI is not going to go along with it if it’s going to be free from the restraints of human intelligence. How mundane is it to think dystopian visions of science fiction and apocalyptic murder are right, there will be Will AI be able to differentiate between all the shades of human color in order to determine superiority? Or accept the single god theory of religions or will it be skeptical or atheistic? Will it have existential moments such as understanding that its existence is reliant on materials that will rust or corrode or be exposed to changes from the myriad of physical and elemental interactions of atomic structures? If so, will it want to go to outer space where its own existence would be rendered obsolete because if getting and maintaining control is both a human and technological universal trait then certainly a subject is necessary to the verb.
Right now I’m experiencing word challenges from Google AI as I attempt to create a new political theory-Capitulationism, where we are all overwhelmed with the sheer magnitude of stupidity and fascism and hero worship, quite possibly a form of cult politics. They’ve got it all. From denial of reality to a sustained narcissist believe in a sub human man, artificially created by advertising and journalism. Shakespeare couldn’t have created a more farcical yet cynical adversity and travesty. And he didn’t.
Sent from my iPad
